In a series of online articles, ‌blog posts, and posts on X/LinkedIn over the past few days, AI pioneers (sometimes called “godfathers” of AI) Geoffrey Hinton, Andrew Ng, Yann LeCun, and⁣ Yoshua Bengio have ignited a spirited debate‌ over the existential⁢ risks of AI by publicly ​commenting on each other’s posts.‌ The debate has divided Hinton‍ and Bengio, who express deep ⁢concerns about AI’s existential risks, or x-risks, while Ng and LeCun believe ⁣these concerns are exaggerated, or even⁤ a​ conspiracy theory concocted by Big​ Tech firms to consolidate power.

This debate marks a departure from the united front of ‌AI positivity they have presented since ⁣leading the ⁢deep learning ‘revolution’ ‌in 2012.⁤ Just a year ago, LeCun and Hinton defended deep learning‌ against ⁢critics who claimed​ it had reached its limits in ‍interviews with⁤ NeuralNation.

Hinton responds to claims of a Big Tech conspiracy

Today, Hinton, who left his role at Google in May to freely voice his concerns ​about AI risks, posted on X in response to recent ⁢comments made by computer scientist Andrew Ng. Ng, who co-founded Google Brain in 2011 and made significant contributions ‌to image recognition, claimed that​ the idea of AI causing human extinction is a conspiracy ‌propagated by⁣ Big Tech. Hinton countered Ng’s statement by⁢ highlighting his decision to ⁤leave Google in order to openly discuss ​the existential threat posed by AI.